|
>>Institute
News Releases
l Media
Kit
2004 |
2005
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008
|
2009
>>
Jan |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
June
June, 2009
|
|
|
|
Pyschology Today,
June
27, 2009 By
Art Markman |
| |
I was reading an article in the June 22
issue of The New Yorker
by John Seabrook that described the
Ceasefire program that aims to curb gang
violence.
The article
described a
collaboration
between the Cincinnati police department
and an anthropologist named David
Kennedy. ... In these meetings, the
gangs were given a strong moral message.
Obviously, gang members who committed
crimes stood the chance of
punishment, but there was also a
clear message that the violence was
wrong and that it damaged the community.
... One way to think about this is that
incarceration (and even capital
punishment) for crime
sets up a business model.
There is some
evidence, though, that the moral
dimension can provide an alternative
motivation for action. For example, Ann
Tenbruensel and
David Messick
published a study in 1999 in
Administrative
Science Quarterly
in which they had business students play
the role of a company manager who had to
decide whether a factor should pay to
have a factory's pollution scrubbers
updated to satisfy new pollution
regulations or to violate those
regulations.
|
|
|
|
|
PRWeek,
June
17, 2009 By Tonya Garcia |
| |
Senior reporter
Tonya Garcia speaks to
Ed Freeman,
academic director, Business Roundtable
Institute for Corporate Ethics, and
Roger Bolton, senior counselor, APCO,
about their role in the recent
publication of the Arthur W. Page
Society and Business Roundtable Trust
Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economist.com,
June
16, 2009 |
| |
The annual meeting is the most visible
evidence that the democracy at the heart
of corporate governance (especially in
America, where shareholders struggle
even to propose motions for discussion
or candidates for the board) is a sham.
One of the great questions surrounding
corporate governance is why the big
institutional shareholders, which tend
to vote in support of management, go
along with such a sham. Why do they not
act as responsible owners and insist
that management take shareholder
democracy more seriously?
One obvious reason
why institutional shareholders do
not take more care in exercising their
votes is that they are too busy trying
to beat the market in the short term, so
as to earn juicy bonuses, even though
taking their duties as owners more
seriously would lead to companies
performing better in the long term.
Public trust in business has plunged
during the current economic crisis, as a
new
report by the Arthur Page
Society and the Business Roundtable
points out. |
|
|
|
|
|
Boursier.com,
June
15, 2009 |
| |
La premiere edition du "Global Ethics
Forum" se tiendre au Palais des Nations
Unies de Geneve les 2 et 3 juillet
prochains.
Parmi les 32 intervenants internationaux
du Global Ethics Forum, trois invites
exceptionnels: ...
Patricia Werhane,
Presidente de l'International Society of
Business
Economics and Ethics (ISBEE) &
Directrice Executive de l'Institute for
Business and Professional Ethics a
dePaul University - Chicago (USA).
|
| |
|
|
|
Management Issues,
June
11, 2009
By Nic Paton |
| |
The pace of job
losses, pay cuts and overtime bans may
be starting to slow on both sides of the
Atlantic, but the loss of public trust
in business, the banking community and
politicians during this recession is
going to take a long, long time to come
back.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
University of Virginia Darden
homepage news,
June
10, 2009 |
| |
A new report on public trust in business
states it clearly: “The issue of public
trust in business has never been more
urgent or consequential than it is
today. In many ways, the current global
economic downturn is, at its core, a
crisis of trust.
”“When
individual businesses and industries
lose trust, their ability to execute
business strategy is significantly
diminished,” said Darden Professor
R. Edward Freeman,
who serves as Academic Director of the
Business Roundtable Institute for
Corporate Ethics.
Freeman was one of six authors, along
with Darden Professor
Jared Harris.
Professor
Andrew C. Wicks
was a contributing writer.
|
| |
|
|
|
Terra Magazine,
June
6, 2009
By
Paulo Nassar |
| |
O 4th Annual Tuck Symposium on
Communication, realizado no último
dia 2, em Nova York, sob o comando do
renomado professor Paul Argenti, colocou
na berlinda corporações, instituições e
a imprensa, ao analisar imagem,
confiança, comportamento e reputação, no
âmbito da crise financeira global.
A confiança da sociedade nos negócios
foi a questão dissecada por
Brian Moriarty e Roger Bolton, que
pinçaram informações entre os associados
do Business Roundtable e da
Arthur Page Society, com faturamento
anual de cerca de US$ 5 trilhões e
empregam perto de 10 milhões de
trabalhadores. |
| |
|
|
|
|
ETHISPHERE,
June
2, 2009 |
| |
The Ethisphere Institute is proud to
welcome Business Roundtable Institute
for Corporate Ethics to the Ethisphere
Council as an exclusive content partner.
Business Roundtable Institute for
Corporate Ethics, an independent
business ethics center that operates in
partnership with Business Roundtable—an
association of chief executive officers
of leading U.S. companies with more than
$5 trillion in annual revenues and
nearly 10 million employees—and academic
experts from top business schools, joins
more than 600 corporate leaders from
various industries across the world on
the Ethisphere Council. |
| |
|
|
|
Olsson Announces New Director
University of Virginia Darden homepage
news, June 2, 2009 |
| |
In the wake of the financial crisis, as
the world debates the causes and cures
and the role of ethics in modern
society, the Olsson Center for Applied
Ethics at the Darden School of Business
announces that Professor
Andrew C. Wicks will become its new
director on July 1, 2009. |
2004 |
2005
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009
>>
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr|
May |
June
|