Institute Home Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Logo Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Banner Spacer Darden Home Business Roundtable Home Institute Home
About the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Business Ethics Seminars Academic Advisors of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Advisory Council of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Business Ethics Publications Business Ethics Research Media Kit for the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics News Business Ethics Resources
spacer
In the News
 

>>Institute News Releases  l  Media Kit


2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009

>> Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sep | Oct l Nov l Dec


November, 200
7

 
Ethics talk calls on 4½ years of prison time
Norfolk Virginian-Pilot, November 30, 2007
By Philip Walzer
 

A former financial planner convicted of money laundering, bribery and conspiracy offered a lesson in ethics this week to business students at Old Dominion University. “I got into a little bit of trouble,” said Patrick Kuhse, who spent four years hiding out in Costa Rica and then 4½ in prison after he surrendered. “It cost me four things: my country, my assets, my freedom and my family.”

 

Dean Krehmeyer, executive director of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics, based at the University of Virginia, hasn’t heard Kuhse speak but is familiar with similar speakers. They “convey a very brutal message of the consequences of one’s actions,” he said. But “we need to be careful that this message doesn’t become the complete message about business ethics. It’s not just to avoid breaking the law and the rules. … We should be seeking to inspire students, not just scare them.”

       
First in His Class Action: The Rise and Fall of William Lerach
WIND-AM (IL)
, November 17, 2007
By Carl Horowitz
  ...corporate corruption remains a fact of life. A company does neither itself nor the free enterprise system any good by committing acts of malfeasance and hiding them from the public. Without integrity, disaster looms, especially with pay structures in place that encourage deception. University of Virginia business professor Jared Harris recently concluded that executive compensation packages heavily geared toward stock options and other performance incentives have been a major factor behind corporate crime.

(This article also appeared on KKOL-AM [WA].)

       
Chiquita, Yahoo Find Trouble Overseas
N
ational Public Radio (NPR), November 16, 2007
  This week, Chiquita was sued for payments it allegedly made to Colombian paramilitaries, and Yahoo issued a formal apology for passing information to the government of China which resulted in the jailing of two Chinese citizens. Corporate ethicist Norman Bowie explores the ethical quandaries faced by multinationals.

(This radio interview also appeared on Lincroft WBJB [NJ].)

Reconciling Religious Beliefs with Work
MSN.com (NAT), November 8, 2008

By Eva Tahmincioglu

  What if your religion required you to wear a beard but your employer has a no-facial-hair policy for all its delivery drivers? More and more, people of faith are deciding they don’t want to leave their religion at the office or factory door, and they want managers to accommodate their beliefs. "People aren’t content to segment religious life and work life anymore," says Andrew Wicks, a professor at the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business.
       
Citigroup and Prince: Too-Risky Business
washingtonpost.com, November 7, 2007
By Steven Pearlstein
 

Darden professor, Jared Harris, has recently studied all the accounting restatements made by major corporations from 1997 to 2002 that were found to be the result of intentional misrepresentation. And what he found was that the propensity to cheat was highly correlated with executive compensation packages heavily weighted (75 percent or more) toward performance pay.

 

In a sense, that is the idea behind performance pay -- to give executives the incentive to take the risks that offer the big payoffs for investors, and then manage those risks. But what Harris found is that at a particular point, when performance pay tops 90 percent, the incentive becomes so strong that it encourages bad risks as well. And that would apply equally, he reasons, to financial risks as it does to the ethical ones he studied.

       
Earnings Guidance – Does It Still Make Sense?
Business Wire (press release), November 6, 2007
  The New York Chapter of the National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI-NY), in conjunction with the organization’s Philadelphia Chapter, will host a panel discussion to explore the evolving practice of earnings guidance at publicly traded companies. The program will explore the pros and cons of providing guidance in general, as well as various methods and timing. The discussion will include the recommendations of the CFA Institute and the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics. Panelists will include Dean Krehmeyer, Executive Director of the Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics.
       

Performance-Pay Perplexes
The New Yorker, November 5, 2007

By James Surowiecki

  The way that hedge-fund managers and investment-bank C.E.O.s get paid is supposed to make them perform better for the investors they serve. In practice, though, things don’t always work that way. Not surprisingly, a recent study of almost a thousand companies found that C.E.O.s whose compensation was made up mostly of stock options tended to “swing for the fences,” making investments and acquisitions that were riskier than those made by other executives. Generous options grants may also encourage fraud; business professors Jared Harris and Philip Bromiley, who have made a study of hundreds of firms forced to restate earnings after accounting irregularities, found that companies that paid out most of their compensation in stock options were far more likely to end up restating earnings.
       
The Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics calls on business schools to adopt principles and practices for building model business ethics programs at their institutions
Business Education Week
, November 2, 2007
  This sentence opened an October 3 press release announcing publication of the Institute’s report, Shaping Tomorrow’s Business Leaders: Principles and Practices for a Model Business Ethics Program. According to the release, “Many leading businesses no longer debate the legitimacy of the role and importance of ethics; rather, they are forging ahead, finding new ways to put ethics into practice.” The report argues that business schools need to recognize this marketplace change and take action to keep pace with the speed of business as they develop the next generation of ethical business leaders. Institute Director Dean Krehmeyer's Viewpoint article was published October 25 on Businessweek.com.
       

2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008| 2009

>> Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | June | July | Aug | Sep | Oct l Nov l Dec

 

 


 

 

Copyright © 2005 Business Roundtable Institute for Corporate Ethics
Questions?  Contact Brian Moriarty